[HanoiLUG] news from the Indian Front [Fwd: Re: [Asiasource2-participants] MS OOXML : Formula for failure]

[Nguyen Vu Hung]

David Tremblay さんは書きました:
> The Discussions on ECMA OOXML is now going on in BIS ( Bureau of Indian
> Standards ) in Wordprocessing ML subcommitee.
> Dr. Nagarjuna from FSF India is representing ODF alliance. All minutes & 
> proceding are archived at http://www.odfalliance.in/OOXML.html
>
> You can use the arguments here. and you can see a model of M$ replys
>
> We found that pushing an Issue list will make more results.
>
> You can use Dr. Nagarjuna's paper too on future campaigns. ( not 
> popularized enough)
> http://www.odfalliance.in/files/bis-note-on-ooxml.pdf
>   
OOXML standard go^`m 6000 trang. Qua' nhie^`u dde^? ddo.c va` co' le~ 
kho^ng 1
ca' nha^n na`o co' tho+`i gian dde^? ddo.c he^'t 6000 trang na`y
va` tranh lua^.n vo+'i M$.

DDa^y la` 1 hi`nh thu+'c cu?a FUD.

Btw, to^?ng ke^'t la.i "paper" cua? Dr. Nagarjuna.

IMO, Ly' do 1 va` 3 quan tro.ng nha^'t dde^? OOXML kho^ng the^? la`
*Open* standard.

* What is a Free/Open Document Standard?

1 Decodability
2 Use of preexisting standards
3 No Private Language Components
4 Implementation Independance
5 Transparent Collaborative Production Process
6 Rationale for deviating from the preexisting standards
7 Demonstrate incommensurability
8 Freedom to implement the standard

* Does OOXML meet the above conditions?

1 OOXML is not decodable in all cases.
2 OOXML does not use many of the existing standards
3 OOXML allows insertion of private language components
4 OOXML is clearly implementation dependent
5 OOXML is not produced collaboratively among the stake holders
6 OOXML specification does not provide rationale for not using or 
deviating the existing standards.
7 OOXML specification does not demonstrate that it is incomensurable 
with the existing standards.